Effectiveness of Identification Methods – References

DELTA Home

7 April 2007

M. J. Dallwitz

Fermanian, T.W., Barkworth, M. and Liu, H. 1989. Trained and untrained individual’s ability to identify morphological characters of immature grasses. Agronomy Journal 81, 918–922.

Morse, D.R., Tardivel, G.M. and Spicer, J.I. 1996. A comparison of the effectiveness of a dichotomous key and a multiaccess key to woodlice. Technical Report 14–96, Computing Laboratory, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK. http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/1996/44/index.html

Stucky, J.M. 1984. Comparison of 2 methods of identifying weed seedlings. Weed Science 32: 598–602.

Tardivel, G. M., and Morse, D. R. 1998. The role of the user in computer-based species identification. In ‘Information technology, plant pathology and biodiversity’, pp. 247–259. (Eds P. Bridge, P. Jeffries, D.R. Morse, and P.R. Scott.) (CAB International: Wallingford.)

Wright, J.F., Morse, D.R., and Tardivel, G.M. 1995. An investigation into the use of hypertext as a user-interface to taxonomic keys. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 11: 19–27.


DELTA Home DELTA Home Page